What security measure can increase protection against insider threats for an air-gapped system?

What security measure can increase protection against insider threats for an air-gapped system?

• A. Two-person integrity
• B. Firewall configuration
• C. Regular audits
• D. Biometric access control

Answer: (A)

The choice indicating two-person integrity is particularly effective in enhancing protection against insider threats in an air-gapped system. This security measure requires that two individuals must be present and agree on actions involving sensitive information or critical operations. The fundamental principle behind two-person integrity is to reduce the singular influence of any one individual, which can mitigate the risk of malicious actions or errors from insiders who might have privileged access. In an air-gapped environment, where systems are isolated from unsecured networks, the risk of insider threats can be significant since the potential for abuse or accidental harm by someone with access remains. By implementing two-person integrity, organizations can foster a dual-control approach that ensures checks and balances. This method not only adds a layer of oversight but also creates a culture of collaboration and responsibility among personnel who handle sensitive data or operations. Other security measures like firewall configuration, regular audits, and biometric access control also provide valuable protections but do not specifically target the insider threat dynamic as effectively as two-person integrity does. Firewalls primarily address unauthorized external access, while regular audits help ensure compliance and detect anomalies post-factum. Biometric access control secures access points but does not inherently safeguard against individuals who already possess legitimate access, therefore not addressing the core of insider threats as directly

The choice indicating two-person integrity is particularly effective in enhancing protection against insider threats in an air-gapped system. This security measure requires that two individuals must be present and agree on actions involving sensitive information or critical operations. The fundamental principle behind two-person integrity is to reduce the singular influence of any one individual, which can mitigate the risk of malicious actions or errors from insiders who might have privileged access.

In an air-gapped environment, where systems are isolated from unsecured networks, the risk of insider threats can be significant since the potential for abuse or accidental harm by someone with access remains. By implementing two-person integrity, organizations can foster a dual-control approach that ensures checks and balances. This method not only adds a layer of oversight but also creates a culture of collaboration and responsibility among personnel who handle sensitive data or operations.

Other security measures like firewall configuration, regular audits, and biometric access control also provide valuable protections but do not specifically target the insider threat dynamic as effectively as two-person integrity does. Firewalls primarily address unauthorized external access, while regular audits help ensure compliance and detect anomalies post-factum. Biometric access control secures access points but does not inherently safeguard against individuals who already possess legitimate access, therefore not addressing the core of insider threats as directly